“There is overwhelming scientific consensus that we have to radically cut the use of fossil fuels, beginning now, aiming for termination a couple of decades from now. If not, we pass irreversible tipping points where there will be a steady decline to the essentially destruction of organized human life on Earth.”
“The business world understands that the way it works is, get deregulation, we move towards monopolization quite naturally, we make risky investments, make a ton of money, and when it all crashes, the state comes in and the friendly taxpayer bails out the business, and we’re seeing it right now, unfortunately, but it happens over and over. So, it’s a market bailout economy for the very rich and many other things that corporations do.”
Right now, the Supreme Court has voted to reduce the power of the EPA, which protects our environment. The court suggests that the EPA doesn’t have the power over the rights of individuals, which is in essence deregulating EPA and contributing to the destruction of organized human life on earth.
As we discussed in a previous article, https://smainstitute.com/eyes-up-and-speak-up/ it is essential to our responsibilities to a world gone amuck to pay attention to the laws that are being passed down to humanity.
The supreme court’s decision is letting us know that we come first no matter what it does to anyone’s else’s development. No matter what it does to polluting our earth.
Deregulation will destroy humanity
We don’t need to save the earth; we need to save humanity. The earth will be fine without us.
In order to save humanity, we need to look out for the laws that are being passed. We need to have our eyes up and pay attention. Then, we need to spread the word.
Heather Cox Richardson states the new law, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency in her Letter’s to Americans below:
Supreme Court Decision in support of human destruction
Today in the Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency decision, the Supreme Court struck at the government regulations that underpin modern America.
Michael and Chantell Sackett bought land near Priest Lake, Idaho, and backfilled the wetlands on the property to build a home. The EPA found they had violated the Clean Water Act, which prohibits putting pollutants into “the waters of the United States.” Officials told them to restore the site or face penalties of more than $40,000 a day. By a vote of 5–4, the Supreme Court found that “waters” refers only to “‘streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes’ and to adjacent wetlands that are ‘indistinguishable’ from those bodies of water due to a continuous surface connection.”
This decision will remove federal protection from half of the currently protected wetlands in the U.S, an area larger than California. Homeowners, farmers, and developers will have far greater latitude to intrude on wetlands than they did previously, and that intrusion has already wrought damage as wetlands act like a sponge to absorb huge amounts of water during hurricanes. From 1992 to 2010, Houston, for example, lost more than 70% of its wetlands to development, leaving it especially vulnerable to Hurricane Harvey, a category 4 hurricane that in 2017 left 107 people dead and caused $125 billion in damage.
The decision said that the EPA had overreached in its protection of wetlands as part of the Clean Water Act, and that Congress must “enact exceedingly clear language” on any rules that affect private property. This court seems eager to gut federal regulation, suggesting that Congress cannot delegate regulatory rulemaking to the executive branch. As investigative journalist Dave Troy put it, “If [the] EPA can’t enforce its rules, what federal agency can?”
Pamela Chambers
pamelachambers.com
Opinions expressed, reflect only the signed author’s views and not the wider views of SMA Institute, or Strategic Management Advisors. They belong to the content creators and not www.thequietrich.com Kevin j Palmer, the organization, its affiliates, or employees. Strategic Mgmt. Advisors/SMAI, author Kevin Palmer http://reawakeninganamericandream.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the content of this site. Information contained herein is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy or usefulness. Kevin Palmer Arizona www.kevinpalmerscottsdale.com makes reasonable efforts to keep information correct, but makes no representations or warranties express or implied about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability with respect to its information. Any reliance you place on this material is strictly at your own risk and Palmer Private Equity or Peace through Prosperity http://KevinjPalmerAuthor.com writer-rebel-producer-poet will not be liable for any false, inaccurate, inappropriate, or incomplete information on these websites. All rights reserved by Kevin J Palmer https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-j-palmer-3694bab1/